But what if we wanted to dull down the power or remove the vent all together? If someone were to put together a protest for those to stop smoking in public, I bet that every non- smoker would say they should. I do not see a ban on those items and I do not see a ban on cars?
Smoking causes premature aging and wrinkles on the face and hands. You would just take away the rights of smokers people just like you, only with different habits because they like to smoke?
Finally, there is the mortality rate. Ignorance is not bliss, so instead of continuing on your pointless rant about how "bad" smokers are, how about you accept the fact that not everyone has the same viewpoint as you do.
In fact, accordintg to some reliable surveys, numbers of smokers are rapidly increasing these day. What I think they should do is just go back to a smoking section with air vents leading upwards and away from people in the smoking section, making it less likely that if a door is opened to the smoking section, that smoke will go out.
The use of tobacco products is one of the main causes of preventable and premature death and disease the world over. If cigarette smoking were to be banned, a lot of people who earn a decent living would suddenly lose it all.
Smoking is a choice via that person. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Smoking causes alot of problems not only for the smoker, but for the people around.
Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
Either that or the government would have to cut its spending. If we should not ban smoking because smokers are well aware of the health issue, should we remove the speed limits on all the highways as well?
Cigarette butts are non-biodegradable and can clog water systems if thrown recklessly. Since he will be unable to smoke in public places, he will learn how to live without it for long hours.
Some critics contend that banning smoking in some places just leaves smokers no choice but to do it somewhere else. The places they do allow smoking might lose a bit of money, but it will also help with the health problems that occur.
They will eventually start and gett into the habit of smoking. Most people beleive that someone who is not in the smoking area of the public place will not be affected by the smoke, but smoke is able to spread in a room and affect the people around.
I have tons more but I'm about to run out of battery, so my last point is that we are building our own natural disasters, like building power plants! Secondly, being in a restaurant and having to smell that smoke while eating is not only disrepectful but also disturbing and once again not healthy.
So if somebody wants to smoke, let him do. They argue that people should have the autonomy to decide on what kind of lifestyle they will have.
Another factor to be taken in account is the environmental point of view. They can affect businesses. Therefore smoking should be banned in public places but more smoking areas should be built as well.
All because people will not go there because they cannot smoke. Also, right now we are both breathing in campfire, barbecues, and even marijuana smoke! Don't make judgements upon a group of people based on stereotypes. I do not see a ban on those items and I do not see a ban on cars?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. And smoking should be allowed too because smokers aren't stupid and do not care about their health even if the smoke they produce can harm other people.
So the next time you want to light up, think of all the lives you indirectly affect.The best one can hope for is the strict regularization of its sale and use. Ban smoking in public places and cars, let smokers do their thing inside the comforts of their home. But to ask for a total ban is virtually impossible.
As for the effects on the personal level, that is up to the user. Smoking, in the United States, is ruled entirely by individual state laws, as the United States Congress has not yet enacted any nationwide federal ban. The following article debates on whether smoking should be banned in public places or not.
Why Smoking should be banned in Public Places It is a touchy subject among young and old alike; whether or not people should be allowed to smoke in public places.
That is a burning question that many people will disagree on. A smoking ban would reduce litter. Although not a primary argument in support of a public smoking ban, it is still a credible one.
No. 3: The lingering odor of stale cigarettes. In bars and restaurants and other establishments that permit smoking, many patrons find the smell of cigarettes to be unpleasant and annoying.
Apr 07, · Smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes in public places should be banned because it’s offensive to the non-smokers who have to endure the smoke, the butts, the mess and the smell.
Consider the typical public place – a market door entrance, a park bench, an cheri197.comon: N Cave Creek Rd, Phoenix, Smoking should be banned in all public places to protect people from second-hand smoke and stop promoting the visual to minors.
The cigarette is a small but deadly habit enjoyed by million Americans. Smoking is illegal inside most public restaurants and buildings as well as on school property.Download